Originally from: Arbitration Law of Czech Republic: Practice and Procedure

Preview Page

25.I. SECTION 25(1) OF THE ARBACT: MAKING THE ARBITRAL AWARD AND A WRITTEN EXECUTION THEREOF
The first sentence of Section 38(1) of the ArbAct is fully applicable to tribunal decision making, i.e. decision making by more than one arbitrator1 (for more on this issue, see the commentary on Section 7 of the ArbAct). When decisions are taken by a sole arbitrator, the award must be signed by that arbitrator. Unlike the full-chamber hearing and adjudication of a case before a court, in arbitration there is no need to draw up a record of votes cast. In cases of tribunal decision making, it is up to the arbitrators deciding on a particular issue and other procedural matters in a case whether to draw up such a record. Nevertheless, it would be appropriate for the written copy of the award to state, at a bare minimum, that the arbitral award has been rendered by a majority or unanimously, as the case may be. If a record is drawn up on the tribunal’s voting, then it is solely at the discretion of the arbitrators whether to include that voting record as part of the case file and, in particular, whether it is to form part of the documentation archived in accordance with Section 29 of the ArbAct. In this respect, provisions of regulations on judicial proceedings cannot be applied to voting records in cases of tribunal decision making. This is because a voting record is always drawn up in judicial proceedings, and the archiving thereof as part of the case file is subject to special arrangements.