Aécio Filipe Oliveira
Av. Pres. Juscelino Kubitschek, 1455 - 10º andar - Itaim Bibi
São Paulo 04543011
Brazil
Visiting attorney of the international arbitration practice, Herbert Smith Freehills Paris (2018); Visiting Researcher, Universität Hamburg, Germany (2018); Legal Consultant, Cotta Mamede Advogados (2017).
Member, Comité Français de l’Arbitrage, (Sep 2018 – Present); Vice-Secretary, LEX (Association des anciens et nouveaux étudiants du Master 2 Recherche Droit international privé et Droit du commerce international de l'Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), (Feb 2018 – Present); Member, Brazilian Bar Association
(Jun 2017 – Present); Member, Inovarb Amcham (Jan 2017 – Present); Member, CBAr (Comitê Brasileiro de Arbitragem) (Jul 2015 – Present); Member, Associação Brasileira de Estudantes de Arbitragem - ABEArb
(Jun 2015 – Present); Member, Young International Arbitration Group (YIAG) (Jun 2015 – Present); Member, Young ICCA (2016 - Present); Member, Moot Alumni Association (MAA) (2016 – Present); Member, Herbert Smith Freehills Alumni (2018 – Present).
As counsel and counsel’s assistant:
International arbitration
Dispute between purchaser and buyer, post M&A transaction in Brazil (BRL 2 billion, Brazilian law, ICC Rules, English language, São Paulo);
Dispute involving Brazilian public company (BRL 22 billion, Brazilian law, Câmara de Arbitragem Mercado (CAM), Portuguese language, São Paulo);
Dispute between investors in a telecommunications operation in Brazil (USD 5 billion Brazilian law, ICC Rules, Portuguese language, London);
Dispute between investors in a telecommunications operation in Brazil (USD 15 billion, Brazilian law, ICC Rules, English language, Paris);
Multimilion dispute between Brazilian mining company (Brazilian law, American Arbitration Association (AAA) Rules, English language, Rio de Janeiro);
Multimilion dispute between Brazilian mining company (Brazilian law , American Arbitration Association (AAA) Rules, English language, Rio de Janeiro);
Dispute involving contractual breach, regarding exploitation agreements (USD 14 million, lex mercatoria, International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) Rules, English, Brussels);
Dispute originated from breach of mineral sales contract (BRL 30 million, Brazilian law, CAM-CCBC Rules, English, São Paulo).
Domestic arbitration (Brazil)
Dispute between Brazilian mining companies, regarding breach of assignment and exploitation agreements of mineral rights (USD 313 million, Brazilian law, ICC Rules, Portuguese, São Paulo);
Dispute involving an M&A operation, where the attainment of targets of an EBTIDA clause were under discussion (BRL 125 million, Brazilian law, CAM-CCBC Rules, Portuguese, São Paulo);
Dispute originated from breach of real estate contract (BRL 120 million, Brazilian law, FGV Rules, English, Rio de Janeiro);
Dispute originated from unpaid legal fees (BRL 50 million, Brazilian law, CAMARB Rules, Portuguese, Belo Horizonte);
Dispute involving construction and real estate companies, originating from an exchange and real estate development contract (BRL 2.3 billion, Brazilian law, CAMARB Rules, Portuguese, Belo Horizonte).
Author: “Dissenting Opinion as an Instrument to Avoid Unfair Civil Liability of Arbitrators: Brazilian perspective”, Diplomatic World, Spring edition DW50, 2016 (English, Belgium);
Co-author: "Sétima Sessão da Arbitration Academy de Paris – 2017", Brazilian Journal of International Arbitration (Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem), Issue 56, 2017 (Brazil, Portuguese);
Co-author: “Financial hardship and the enforceability of an arbitration clause in corporate and commercial disputes between legal entities”, YAR (Young Arbitration Review), 22 ed, 2016 (Portugal, English);
Co-author: “Dissenting Opinion em Arbitragens Comerciais Internacionais e seus Possíveis Efeitos: Estudo Comparativo entre a Doutrina Internacional e o Arcabouço Jurídico do Brasil e da Itália”, CEDIN, v.17, 2016. (Brazil, Portuguese);
Co-author: “E-Discovery in International Arbitration: Is it a barrier to a cost-effective procedure?”, Financier Worldwide, June Edition, 2016 (Electronic magazine, English);
Co-author: “O Arcabouço Jurídico da Justiça de Transição: Comparações Teóricopráticas entre Brasil e Argentina”, Book : Justiça de Transição nos 25 anos da Constituição de 1988, IDEJUST, INITIA VIA, 2014 (Brazil, Portuguese).