1. Under Swiss law, for the interpretation of contracts, one first has to look at the text. If the text is not clear, then one must look at the intention of the Parties (subjective test); if that cannot be established, then the contract should be interpreted in an objective manner (objective test). However, the UCI-ADR may be more in the realm of a statute, a bylaw, or general conditions to a contract rather than a contract between the parties. According to the CAS jurisprudence, in practice, the principles of interpretation overlap to a large degree and both methods converge considering that the literal meaning (the wording) of the provision or clause is the starting point. In any event, according to the Swiss Federal Tribunal, if the text of statutes, rules or regulations is not clear and unambiguous, and if the intention of the parties to such statutes, rules or regulations cannot be established – if that subjective criterion should play a role at all in this context – the interpretation must be on the basis of what the other party to the one from whom such statutes, rules or regulations emanate could reasonably expect the meaning thereof to be.