Preliminary Conferences and Pre-Hearing Management in General - Chapter 6 - The College of Commercial Arbitrators Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration - 2nd Edition
David N. Brainin, Esq., Of Counsel, Locker, Greenberg & Brainin, New York, New York
James P. Groton, Esq., Independent Arbitrator, Atlanta, Georgia
Gerald F. Phillips, Esq., Partner, Phillips, Lerner, Lauzon & Jamra, Los Angeles, California
Deborah Rothman, Esq., Independent Arbitrator & Mediator, Los Angeles, California
Curtis E. von Kann, Since 1997 he has been a full-time arbitrator, mediator, and neutral case evaluator in the Washington, DC office of JAMS, where he has served as sole arbitrator, tribunal member, and tribunal chair in a broad range of xxviii Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration commercial arbitrations. Judge von Kann is a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators in London, a member of the Distinguished Neutrals Roster of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR), and Immediate Past President of the College of Commercial Arbitrators and has lectured and published on many ADR topics. He served as Editor-in-Chief of the first edition of the College of Commercial Arbitrators Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration.
Arbitrators’ goals in managing the pre-hearing process are (1) to work with counsel in devising fair and efficient procedures for the pre-hearing and hearing phases of the arbitration, (2) to monitor the parties’ compliance with those procedures, and (3) to resolve promptly any disputes or problems that might delay the arbitration.
I. THE IMPORTANCE OF PRE-HEARING MANAGEMENT
From the time of appointment to the commencement of the hearing, arbitrators should take an active, hands-on approach to managing the pre-hearing process by working with counsel to establish and implement fair and efficient procedures and schedules that are appropriate to the particular case.
Like most things in life, getting an arbitration off on the right foot and keeping it on track are critical to a successful process. Although responsibility for managing arbitrations falls squarely on arbitrators, they should not attempt to perform this task without assistance. Counsel, who know far more about the case than the arbitrators and often have considerable arbitration experience and insight, are essential partners in the undertaking. From their first contact with counsel, arbitrators should set a tone of professionalism, cooperation, and mutual respect. They should make clear that although the ultimate responsibility (and authority) for managing the arbitration rests with them, they intend to work with counsel in developing a process appropriate to the particular case and in turn, expect counsel to act cooperatively and professionally with the arbitrators and each other.
I. THE IMPORTANCE OF PRE-HEARING MANAGEMENT
II. CONVENING THE PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
A. Time of the Preliminary Conference
B. Who Should Attend the Preliminary Conference
C. Location of the Preliminary Conference
D. Giving Notice of the Preliminary Conference
III. CONDUCTING THE PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
A. Arbitrators’ Introductory Statement
B. Opening Statements by Counsel
C. Determining the Issues on the Conference Agenda
IV. MEMORIALIZING THE PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
V. MATTERS TO ADDRESS AT THE PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
A. Identity of the Parties
B. Claims and Defenses Presented
C. Applicable Arbitration Agreement, Law, and Rules
D. Disputes Concerning Arbitrability
E. Information Required for Additional Disclosure
F. Disqualification of Counsel
G. Consolidation and Joinder
H. Discovery
I. Motions
J. Providing Specialized Information to Arbitrators
K. Appointment of Neutral Experts
L. Communication Ground Rules
M. Location of the Hearing
N. Dates of the Hearing
O. Hearing Subpoenas for Non-Party Witnesses
P. Continuances and Cancellations
Q. Nature of Award
R. Time of Award
S. Hearing Procedures Checklist
T. Other Matters
VI. ENCOURAGING MEDIATION OR OTHER SETTLEMENT EFFORTS
VII. SUBSEQUENT PRE-HEARING MANAGEMENT