Who is Seeking to Use ADR? Why Do They Choose to do So? - Dispute Resolution Journal - Vol. 51, No. 1
Lamont E. Stallworth is a professor at the Institute of Human Resources and Industrial Relations, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois. He is also founder of the Center for Employment Dispute Resolution, a member of the National Academy of Arbitrators and past president of the Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution.
Linda K. Stroh is an associate professor at the Institute of Human Resources and Industrial Relations, Loyola University, Chicago, and a member of the board of directors of the Center for Employment Dispute Resolution.
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Carolyn Hernandez, executive director, CEDR; Gail Bradshaw, executive director, Illinois Human Rights Commission; Amy White, graduate assistant, Institute of Human Resources and Industrial Relations, Loyola; and Vida E. Stanius for their efforts and support in completing this study. The comments and conclusions are those solely of the authors. This study was supported by a grant from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the Fund for Labor Studies at the University of Michigan.
Originally from Dispute Resolution Journal
As we approach the year 2000, there will be more females, members of racial minorities, individuals over the age of 40 and disabled employees in the workplace than ever before.1 For employers, labor organizations and public policy makers, the term diversity must take on increasingly significant meaning.2 Yet future scholars may look back on our time and say, as Charles Dickens did about the last decades of an earlier century, “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.”
Attendant with this dramatic demographic change in the workplace are numerous federal, state and local Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) or antidiscrimination statutes and ordinances. These statutes include, but are not limited to, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act; the Pregnancy Disability Act; the Americans with Disabilities Act; and the Civil Rights Act of 1991.3 All represent good public policy. As a matter of public policy, our industrial society has recognized that sexism, racism and ageism shall not be used as a basis for depriving individuals of the privilege or the right to contract their labor.4 Consequently, it is now essentially unlawful for an employer or labor organization to discriminate against individuals based on their race, sex, or other “immutable characteristics.”5