Switzerland: Conciliation and Mediation under the New Provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure - WAMR 2015 Vol. 9, No. 1
Author(s):
Andrea E. Rusca
Page Count:
14 pages
Media Description:
1 PDF Download
Published:
July, 2015
Jurisdictions:
Description:
Originally From World Arbitration and Mediation Review (WAMR)
Preview Page
I. INTRODUCTION
In Switzerland, although most of the substantive laws have
been implemented at the federal level, such as the 1907 Swiss
Civil Code,1 the 1911 Swiss Code of Obligations,2 and the 1937
Swiss Criminal Code,3 each Canton has retained the privilege of
legislating on civil and criminal procedural rules. Each of these
cantonal sets of procedural rules has been applied by cantonal
tribunals and superior cantonal courts, whose decisions remain
under the final supervision of the Swiss Federal Tribunal, the
Supreme Court.
Hence, for many decades, Switzerland, a small country with a
population of less than eight million in 2012, had up to 26
different codes of procedures both in civil and criminal matters
and 26 separate judicial systems.
For lawyers, it was extremely difficult to move from the
judicial system and procedural legal systems of one Canton to
another. This difficulty was enhanced by linguistic obstacles in a
country having four official languages – German, French, Italian,
and Romansh – and with laws, regulations, and court decisions
litigated and written, depending on the seat of the first court, in
German, French, or Italian.
However, with the entry into force on January 1, 2011 of the
Unified Swiss Code of Civil Procedure (“SCCP”),4 the cross-cantonal
exercise of the legal profession has been slightly simplified.
In addition to this simplification, the SCCP also provides for a
new approach to the conciliation and mediation processes.5
By comparison, in 1993, when I was doing the two-year
trainee lawyer period at the Geneva Bar and the “conciliation”
process was governed by the old Geneva Code of Civil Procedure,
the “conciliation” process was a mere formality in which the
physical presence of the parties was not even requested.
physical presence of the parties was not even requested.