Representing Clients in Mediations - Chapter II.3 - Practitioner's Handbook On International Arbitration And Mediation- 3rd Edition
Robert B. Davidson is a Mediator and Arbitrator, and the Executive Director of JAMS Arbitration Practice. He has arbitrated approximately 70 cases as sole arbitrator and as a member of tripartite panels in both institutional and ad hoc settings. Over the course of his career as Partner at Baker & McKenzie, Mr. Davidson acted as counsel for clients in approximately 100 arbitrations involving a variety of disputes, including serving as lead counsel in numerous domestic and international arbitrations, including 11 cases before the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal (more than any other lawyer) and cases before the U.N. Compensation Commission. He is past Chair, of the Committee on Arbitration of the New York City Bar Association; a Fellow and Board Member, College of Commercial Arbitrators and a Fellow, American Bar Foundation.
Originally from Practitioner's Handbook On International Arbitration And Mediation- 3rd Edition
This chapter discusses the attorney’s preparation for a mediation and the actual conduct of the mediation, including the following: (1) advising the client about the mediation option, (2) negotiating an agreement to mediate with the other attorney, (3) preparing for the mediation sessions (preparing the case and the client), and (4) representing the client in the mediation sessions (pre-mediation conference, formal mediation sessions, and post sessions).
§ 3.01 Overview of Attorneys’ Roles in Mediation
Practitioner’s Hint: Attorneys should understand how the mediation process works, just as attorneys should understand how any forum works in which attorneys represent clients. In case the mediation does not settle everything, attorneys should be familiar with alternative options for resolving any remaining issues.
Attorneys perform various functions when representing clients in mediations. That representational work is different from what attorneys do when representing clients in settlement conferences, depositions, motions, arbitrations, or judicial trials. For each of those other forums, experienced attorneys know the routine. Many attorneys, however, are less familiar in representing clients in mediation.
Many attorneys, when they appear in mediations, rely on familiar advocacy skills, which, although appropriate for the judicial forum, are often not appropriate for mediations. As a result, many sophisticated and experienced litigators muddle through mediation sessions or engage in behavior that inhibits a resolution. They are learning on the job--out of necessity. Many attorneys went to law school before courses on dispute resolution were offered. The courses which law schools have begun teaching within the last fifteen years have been largely limited to teaching about the mediation process, not how to represent clients in mediations. Continuing legal education programs are only beginning to focus on teaching representational skills.
Given that the technique of mediation is fairly new many practicing lawyers find the mediation environment unfamiliar. Attorneys, however, should possess an understanding of three basic subjects.
First and foremost, attorneys should have knowledge of the theory and practice of negotiations, realizing that mediation is a similar, but not identical process. The very skills in preparing for and participating in a negotiation apply to preparing for and participating in a mediation. For instance, an attorney who practices interest-based negotiations should engage in the same interest-based analysis and strategies when representing a client in the mediation process.
