Chapter 17 - Applicable Procedural Law - International Arbitration Law And Practice, Third Edition
Mauro Rubino-Sammartano is a Partner at LawFed-BRSA. Mr. Rubino-Sammartano is currently the President of the European Court of Arbitration and of the Mediation Centre of Europe, the Mediterranean and Middle East. He is also an associate member, as Italian advocate of Littleton Chambers in London. Mr. Rubino-Sammartano has acted and regularly acts as chairman, party-appointed, sole arbitrator and counsel in a large number of arbitral proceedings. His practice is largely based on international and national litigation and arbitration in the field of contracts, construction law, mergers and acquisitions, sales of goods, joint ventures and interlocutory injunctions.
Originally from International Arbitration Law and Practice, Third Edition
17.1. Internal and External Procedural Issues
The applicable procedural law must be identified.1
“Where the parties have failed to choose the law governing the arbitration proceedings, those proceedings must be considered, at any rate prima facie, as being governed by the law of the country most closely connected with the proceedings.”
A useful distinction amongst the issues that arise from the procedural law of arbitration is due to highly reputed commentators on conflicts:2
“In essence, the procedural law of an arbitration deals with two sets of issues: (a) the internal procedure of the arbitration itself: commencement of the arbitration, appointment of arbitrators, pleadings, provisional measures, evidence, hearings and awards and (b) the external intervention of national Courts in the arbitral process.”
CHAPTER 17: APPLICABLE PROCEDURAL LAW
Internal and External Procedural Issues
17.1 Internal and External Procedural Issues
Choice by the Parties
17.2 The Parties’ Freedom of Choice
Applicable Law
17.3 Possibility to Apply a Procedural Law Different from that of the Place of Arbitration
17.4 Denationalization of Arbitral Proceedings
17.5 Nationless vis-à-vis International Arbitration
17.6 No Absolute Need for a National Procedural Law
17.7 Supranationality of Arbitration Rules
Selection of the Procedural Law – Effects
17.8 Different Possible Selections of the Procedural Law
17.9 Several Procedural Laws and a Procedural Tronc Commun
17.10 Rationale and Effects of the Choice of a Procedural Law Different from the Law of the Place of Arbitration
Procedural Public Policy
17.11 Procedural Public Policy
17.12 Conclusions