Appealability of an Order to Stay or Compel Arbitration - Dispute Resolution Journal - Vol. 69, No. 4
Author(s):
Ira C. Wolpert
Page Count:
4 pages
Media Description:
1 PDF Download
Published:
December, 2014
Jurisdictions:
Description:
Originally from Dispute Resolution Journal
Preview Page
The judicial determination that an order to stay or compel
arbitration is a "final order" subject to appellate review has resulted in
often contradictory and inconsistent rulings, dependent upon the
application of state or federal law, and if the appeal relates to a
motion to compel arbitration or an order on a motion to stay
arbitration. See 6 A.L.R. 4th 652, Appealability of state court's order
or decree compelling or refusing to compel arbitration, (originally
published in 1981); 13 Cyc. of Federal Proc. § 57.90.50 (3d.ed.); 21
Williston on Contracts § 57.61 (4th ed. 2013).
Recently, in a twenty-six page opinion which engendered a dissent
and thirty-eight footnotes, Maryland's highest court held that the
denial of a petition to compel arbitration was not a final appealable
judgment. The majority opinion and dissent each address the public
policy argument whether allowing immediate appeals from orders
denying or granting arbitration further or impede the benefits of
alternate dispute resolution.
Significantly, both the majority opinion and the dissent agreed that
appeal of a denial or grant of arbitration filed in a separate and
independent action is immediately appealable as a final order.
American Bank Holdings, Inc. v. Kavanagh, 436 Md. 457, 82 A.3d 867
(Md. 2013).
BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Brian Kavanagh and Jeffrey Weber were employed by American as
co-branch managers in Baltimore, Maryland, for the purpose of
originating, making and selling residential mortgage loans. Their
employment agreement provided them with a bonus of a percentage
of a loss reserve funded with funds earned by them, which was
payable to them six months after termination of their agreements.
Each employment agreement contained an arbitration clause which
provided that any controversy or claim should be settled by arbitration
and in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland, but which
excluded arbitration of claims for equitable relief.
After they terminated their employment, they asserted American
failed to pay them the funds due them from the loss reserve after
numerous requests to American to account for the loss reserve, which
they alleged was approximately $250,000. They filed a complaint for
accounting.
American filed a denial and raised as a preliminary defense that the
court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case because the claims were
subject to mandatory arbitration, and filed in the case a petition to
compel arbitration and to stay all proceedings.
compel arbitration and to stay all proceedings.